While there were fewer incidents of militant violence in 2016 than in previous years, scores of people were killed in bombings that targeted courts and mosques. Law enforcement and security agencies remained unaccountable for human rights violations and exercised disproportionate political influence, especially on matters of national security and counterterrorism. The military continued to control implementation of a national plan to address terrorism, largely without civilian oversight.
At least 85 people on death row were executed in 2016. Secret military courts continued to operate and hand down death sentences.
The government muzzled dissenting voices in nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and media. It passed vague and overbroad cybercrimes legislation installing new curbs of freedom of expression and criminalizing peaceful internet use.
Women, religious minorities, and transgender people faced violent attacks, insecurity, and persecution, with the government failing to provide adequate protection and hold perpetrators accountable.
Police pressure and abuses compelled thousands of Afghans living in Pakistan to return to Afghanistan or flee elsewhere in 2016.
Counterterrorism and Law Enforcement Abuses
Suicide bombings, armed attacks, and killings by the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and their affiliates targeted nearly every sector of Pakistani society, including religious minorities, security personnel, health workers, lawyers, and journalists, resulting in hundreds of deaths. Military courts sentenced at least 100 people to death in connection with the attacks. Shrouded in secrecy, the proceedings raised fair trial concerns.
In May, Aftab Ahmad, a member of the Karachi-based political party, Mutahidda Qaumi Movement (MQM), was killed while in the custody of the Pakistan Rangers, a federal paramilitary force. An autopsy report found that over 35 percent of his body was covered in bruises and abrasions inflicted while he was still alive, indicating torture. In an unusual step, the chief of army staff, Gen. Raheel Sharif, ordered a military inquiry into the death.
Dr. Asim Hussain, a member of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), detained on August 26, 2015, on charges including “harboring and treating terrorists and gangsters” at his hospital, remained in custody. Local groups expressed serious concerns about Hussain’s treatment in Rangers’ custody and its impact on his mental health.
In April, Pakistani authorities used anti-terrorism laws and excessive force to prevent tenant farmers in Okara district, Punjab province, from demonstrating in favor of land rights.
At least 19 people remained on death row after being convicted under Pakistan’s draconian blasphemy law and hundreds awaited trial. Most of those facing blasphemy are members of religious minorities, often victimized by these charges due to personal disputes.
The government continued to actively encourage legal and procedural discrimination against members of the Ahmadiyah religious community by failing to repeal discriminatory laws.
In March, at least 74 people were killed and 338 others injured in a suicide bombing in a public park in Lahore. The primary target of the attack was Christians celebrating Easter.
Freedom of Expression and Attacks on Civil Society
Many journalists increasingly practice self-censorship, fearing retribution from security forces, military intelligence, and militant groups. Media outlets in 2016 remained under pressure to avoid reporting on or criticizing human rights violations in counterterrorism operations. The Taliban and other armed groups threatened media outlets and targeted journalists and activists for their work.
In January, the Pakistan Rangers entered and, without a warrant, searched the Karachi house of Salman Masood, a New York Times journalist. The Interior Ministry issued an apology and ordered an inquiry, while other members of the administration claimed the raid was part of a broader search operation in the area. However, only one other house was searched, raising concerns that the raid’s aim was to harass and intimidate Masood.
In May, four unidentified gunmen killed Khurram Zaki in Karachi. Zaki had been publicly critical of extremist cleric Abdul Aziz and militant sectarian groups, and had been receiving threats. He had confided to friends that he was on several militant “hitlists.”
In August, MQM supporters attacked the office of ARY, one of the country’s largest news broadcasters, after Altaf Husain, the party chief, publicly encouraged them to attack media outlets for not covering party protests.
Militant groups targeted lawyers, courts, and teachers. In January, armed militants attacked Bacha Khan University in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, killing at least 20 people. In March, a suicide bombing at the district courts in Charsadda, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, killed 17 people. In August, a suicide attack in Quetta, Balochistan, killed 70 people, most of them lawyers gathered at a hospital emergency room following the shooting of Bilal Kasi, president of the Balochistan bar association. The Islamic State (ISIS) and Jamat-ul-Ahrar, a Pakistani Taliban offshoot, claimed responsibility for the attacks. In September, a Jamaat-ul-Ahrar suicide bombing at the district courts in Mardan killed 14 people.
In August, the Prevention of Cybercrimes law was enacted, which allows the government to censor online content and to criminalize internet user activity under extremely broad and vague criteria. The law also sanctions government authorities to access data of internet users without judicial review or oversight.
A year after the government announced a policy for “Regulation of INGOs in Pakistan,” there were credible reports of the policy being used to harass and impede the work of international humanitarian and human rights groups. In March, three Islamabad-based human rights groups had to stop work for not complying with regulatory requirements. Numerous nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), particularly in Punjab province, were intimidated, harassed, and in some case had their offices sealed on the pretext of implementation of the national plan against terrorism.
Women’s and Girls’ Rights
Child marriage remains a serious concern in Pakistan, with 21 percent of girls marrying before the age of 18. In January 2016, a proposal submitted to parliament by WHOM aimed to raise the legal minimum age to 18 for females and introduce harsher penalties for those who arrange child marriage. However, on January 14, 2016, the proposal was withdrawn following strong pressure from the Council of Islamic Ideology, a body that advises the parliament on Islamic law. The council criticized the proposal as “anti-Islamic” and “blasphemous.”
Violence against women and girls—including rape, murder through so-called honor killings, acid attacks, domestic violence, and forced marriage—remained routine. Pakistani human rights NGOs estimate that there are about 1,000 “honor killings” every year.
The government continued to fail to address forced conversions of women belonging to Hindu and Christian communities.
In June, Zeenat Rafiq, 18, was burned to death in Lahore by her mother for “bringing shame to the family” by marrying a man of her choosing. In May, family members tortured and burned to death a 19-year-old school teacher in Murree, Punjab, for refusing an arranged marriage. In May, the body of Amber, 16, was found inside a vehicle that had been set on fire in Abbottabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, after a jirga, or traditional assembly of elders, ordered her death for helping her friend marry of her own choice. In July, Qandeel Baloch, a well-known Pakistani model was killed by her brother in a so-called honor killing.
Pakistani law allows the family of a murder victim to pardon the perpetrator. This practice is often used in cases of “honor” killings, where the victim and perpetrator frequently belong to the same family, in order to evade prosecution. The 2004 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act made “honor killings” a criminal offense, but the law remains poorly enforced. An anti-honor killing bill seeking to eliminate the option of murder committed in the name of “honor” to be “forgiven” was passed by the parliament in October.
Use of child suicide bombers by the Taliban and other armed groups continued in 2016.
In May, the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child concluded its review of Pakistan and expressed concern about a number of issues affecting children including executions, the impact of sectarian violence and terrorism, and alleged torture and ill-treatment in police custody.
The Pakistan government failed to meet its international legal obligation to protect more than 2 million Afghans in the country, including those not registered as refugees, from harassment and other abuses.
The number of Afghans repatriating from Pakistan increased in 2016 due to coercive pressure from local governments; at the end of August, about 70,000 registered refugees had been repatriated.
The uncertain residency status of Afghan refugees in Pakistan encouraged police harassment, threats, and extortion, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Statements by senior Pakistani officials in 2016 raised concerns of new government actions to restrict the rights of Afghan refugees in the country.
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Pakistan’s penal code criminalizes sexual behavior between men with possible life imprisonment. In 2009, Pakistan’s Supreme Court called for improved police response to cases involving transgender people, and to ensure the rights of transgender people to basic education, employment, and protection. However, despite the court order, violent attacks on transgender and intersex women in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province surged in 2016, with unknown assailants frequently targeting those involved in activism.
Official responses have been inadequate. Since January 2015, human rights groups in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have recorded dozens of threats to, and attacks on, people and property, including abuses while in police custody. In a widely publicized case in May, Alisha, a 23-year-old transgender activist, was shot eight times in Peshawar, and died in hospital while staff debated whether to put her in the male or female ward. In September, the National Commission for Human Rights called on the government to investigate the attacks.
Pakistan has more than 8,000 prisoners on death row, one of the world’s largest populations of prisoners facing execution. Pakistani law mandates capital punishment for 28 offenses, including murder, rape, treason, and blasphemy. Those on death row are often from the most marginalized sections of society, including people with disabilities. At least 85 people were executed in 2016.
Key International Actors
Pakistan’s volatile relationship with United States, the country’s largest development and military donor, deteriorated amid signs of mistrust. US foreign assistance to Pakistan fell to the lowest level since 2007. In August, the US stopped payment of US$300 million in military reimbursements to Pakistan for not taking adequate action against the Haqqani network, a Taliban-affiliated group that is accused of planning and carrying out attacks on civilians, government officials, and NATO forces in Afghanistan.
Pakistan and China deepened extensive economic and political ties, and work continued the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, a project consisting of construction of roads, railways and energy pipelines.
The United Nations high commissioner for human rights expressed concern after historically tense relations between Pakistan and India further deteriorated in 2016, with both countries accusing each other of facilitating unrest and militancy. Scheduled talks to resolve longstanding disputes over security, territory, and sharing river water resources stalled.
In September, an armed group attack on an Indian military base in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir heightened tensions between the two sides. India claimed that the attackers were backed by the Pakistan government. Pakistan denied involvement.
The United Nations high commissioner for refugees termed Pakistan’s treatment of Afghan refugees as a “concerted push” to repatriate a large number of refugees. Relations with Afghanistan remained characterized by mutual hostility and mistrust. The Afghan government accused Pakistan of allowing the Haqqani network to operate from Pakistan to carry out attacks in Afghanistan. Pakistan maintained that the network had been dismantled.
1. Sethi BB. Family as a potent therapeutic force. Indian J Psychiatry. 1989;31:22–30.[PMC free article][PubMed]
2. Sholevar PG. Introduction: Family theory and therapy. In: Sholevar PG, Schwoeri L D, editors. Textbook of Family and Couples Therapy: Clinical Applications. Rockville, MD: Aspen; 2003. pp. 3–25. Part 1; Chap 1.
3. McGill D. Cultural concepts for family therapy. In: Hansen J, Falicov C, editors. Cultural Perspectives in Family Therapy: The Family Therapy Collections. Rockville MD: Aspen; 1983. pp. 108–21.
4. McGoldrick M, Giordano J, Pearce J, editors. Ethnicity and Family Therapy. 2nd ed. The Guilford Press; 1996.
5. Falicov C, Brudner-White L. Shifting the family triangle: The issue of cultural and contextual relativity. In: Hansen J, Falicov C, editors. Cultural Perspectives in Family Therapy: The Family Therapy Collections. Rockville MD: Aspen; 1983. pp. 51–67.
6. McGill DW. The cultural story in multicultural family therapy. Fam Soc. 1992;73:339–49.
7. Schwartzman J. Family ethnography: A tool for clinicians. In: Hansen J, Falicov C, editors. Cultural Perspectives in Family Therapy: The Family Therapy Collections. Rockville MD: Aspen; 1983. pp. 122–35.
8. Johnson AC. Resiliency mechanisms in culturally diverse families. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families. 1995;3:316–324.
9. Preli R, Bernard JM. Making multiculturalism relevant for majority culture graduate students. J Mar Fam Ther. 1993;19:5–16.
10. Thomas AJ. Understanding culture and worldview in family systems: Use of the multicultural genogram. Fam J: Couns Ther Couples Fam. 1998;6:24–32.
11. Avasthi A. Indianizing psychiatry: Is there a case enough? Indian J Psychiatry. 2011;53:111–20.[PMC free article][PubMed]
12. Avasthi A. Preserve and strengthen family to promote mental health. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:113–26.[PMC free article][PubMed]
13. Desai J. Intergenerational conflict within Asian American families: The role of acculturation, ethnic identity, individualism, and collectivism. Diss Abstr Int. 2007;67:7369.
14. Nelson K, Fivush R. The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychol Rev. 2004;111:486–511.[PubMed]
15. Triandis HC. Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross Cult Res. 1993;27:155–80.
16. Skillman G. Intergenerational conflict within the family context: A comparative analysis of collectivism and individualism within Vietnamese, filipino, and caucasian families. Diss Abstr Int. 2000;60:4910.
17. Markus H, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98:224–53.
18. Varma VK. Present state of psychotherapy in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 1982;24:209–26.[PMC free article][PubMed]
19. Surya N, Jayaram S. Some basic considerations in the practice of psychotherapy in the Indian setting. Indian J Psychiatry. 1964;6:153.[PMC free article][PubMed]
20. Neki JS. Confidentiality, secrecy, and privacy in psychotherapy: Sociodynamic considerations. Indian J Psychiatry. 1992;34:171–3.[PMC free article][PubMed]
21. Manickam LS. Psychotherapy in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:S366–70.[PMC free article][PubMed]
22. Mullatti L. Families in India: Beliefs and realities. J Comp Fam Stud. 1995;26:11–25.
23. Chekki D. Family values and family change. Indian J Soc Work. 1996;69:338–48.
24. Bhat PN, Arnold F, Gupta K, Kishor S, Parasuraman S, Arokiasamy, Singh SK, Lhungdim H. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. I. Mumbai India: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2005–06; 2007. Household Population and Housing Characteristics; pp. 21–52. Chap 2.
25. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 1998-99. India Mumbai: 2000. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro.
26. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-1), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 1992-93. India Mumbai: 1995. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro.
27. Sinha D. Some recent changes in Indian family and their impications for socialization. Indian J Soc Work. 1984;45:271–86.
28. Myrdal G. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press; 1968.
29. Sethi B, Chaturvedi P. A review and role of family studies and mental health. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 1985;1:216–30.
30. Chandrashekhar C, Rao N, Murthy R. The chronic mentally ill and their families. In: Bharat S, editor. Research on Families with Problems in India: Issues and Implications. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences; 1991. pp. 113–20.
31. Murlidharan R. Size of family and its relationship with behavior difficulties in children. J Psychol Res. 1969;13:94–100.
32. Kulhara P, Chakrabarti S. Culture and schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2001;24:449–64.[PubMed]
33. Bennett L. The Role of Women in Income Production and Intrahousehold Allocation of Resources as a Determinant of Child Health and Nutrition. Geneva: WHO/UNICEF; 1983.
34. Broderick C, Schrader S. The history of professional marriage and family therapy. In: Gurman A, Kniskern D, editors. Handbook of Family Therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1991.
35. Guttman H. Systems theory, cybernetics, and epistemology. In: Gurman A, Kniskern D, editors. Handbook of Family Therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1991.
36. Becvar D, Becvar R. Family Therapy: A Systemic Integration. 7th ed. Pearson; 2008.
37. Vidyasagar . Innovations in Psychiatric Treatment at Amritsar Mental Hospital. New Delhi: WHO. SEA/Ment; 1971.
38. Bhatti R, Varghese M. Family Therapy in India. Indian Soc Psychiatry. 1995;11:30–4.
39. Verghese A. Involvement of families in mental health care. J Christ Med Assoc India. 1971;46:247.
40. Narayanan HS. Experiences with group and family therapy in India. Int J Group Psychother. 1977;27:517–9.[PubMed]
41. Bhatti R, Channabasavanna S. Social system approach to understand family disharmony. Indian J Soc Work. 1979;40:70–80.
42. Bhatti RS, Janakiramaiah N, Channabasavanna SM. Family psychiatric ward treatment in India. Fam Process. 1980;19:193–200.[PubMed]
43. Geetha PR, Channabasavanna SM, Bhatti RS. The study of efficacy of family ward treatment in hysteria in comparison with the open ward and the outpatient treatment. Indian J Psychiatry. 1980;22:317–23.[PMC free article][PubMed]
44. Bhatti RS, Subba Krishna DK, Ageira BL. Validation of family interaction patterns scale. Indian J Psychiatry. 1986;28:211–6.[PMC free article][PubMed]
45. Bhatti R, Channabasavanna SM, Prabhu L, Subha Krishna D, Shivaji R. A manual on family typology scale. Bangalore: Eastern Press; 1985.
46. Shah A. Assessment of Marital Life. 1991
47. Varghese M, Bhatti R, Raghuram A, Chandra P, Uday Kumar G, Shah A. Training in Family Therapy at NIMHANS. In: Kapur M, Shama Sundar C, Bhatti R, editors. Psychotherapy Training in India. Bangalore: NIMHANS; 2001. pp. 112–5.
48. Verghese M, Uday Kumar G. An integrative systemic model of family therapy at NIMHANS. In: Bhatti R, Verghese M, Raghuram A, editors. Changing Marital and Family Systems, Challenges to Conventional Model in Mental Health. Bangalore: NIMHANS; 2003.
49. National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences. NIMHANS: Family Psychiatry Centre: Publications [Internet] 2012. [Last cited 2012 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.nimhans.kar.nic.in/fpc/publication.htm .
50. Prabhu LR, Desai NG, Raghuram A, Channabasavanna SM. Outcome of family therapy: Two year follow-up. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1988;34:112–7.[PubMed]
51. Chandra P, Varghese M, Anantharaman Z, Channabasavanna S. Family therapy in poor outcome schizophrenia and the need to look beyond psychoeducation. Fam Ther. 1994;21:47.
52. Channabasavanna S, Bhatti R. Family therapy of alcohol addicts. In: Ramachandran V, Palaniappan V, Shaw L, editors. Continuing Medical Education Programme. Madras: Indian Psychiatric Society; 1982. pp. 17–23.
53. Chandra PS, Shah A, Shenoy J, Kumar U, Varghese M, Bhatti RS, et al. Family pathology and anorexia in the Indian context. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1995;41:292–8.[PubMed]
54. Swamy HS, Mallikarjunaiah M, Bhatti RS, Kaliaperumal VG. A study of epileptic psychoses-150 cases. Indian J Psychiatry. 1986;28:231–6.[PMC free article][PubMed]
55. Anant S, Raguram A. Marital conflict among parents: Implications for family therapy with adolescent conduct disorder. Contemp Fam Ther. 2005;27:473–82.
56. Bhatti R, Sobhana H. A model for enhancing marital and family relationships. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 2000;16:47–52.
57. Channabasavanna S, Bhatti R. Utility of “Role Expectation Model” in treatment of marital problems. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 1985;2:105–20.
58. Isaac R, Shah A. Sex roles and marital adjustment in Indian couples. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2004;50:129–41.[PubMed]
59. Shah A, Gaur S, Gaonkar M, Raguram A. Relationship attributions and marital quality in women with depression. Eastern J Psychiatry. 2003;7:62–70.
60. Bhatti R, Beig A. Family violence: A systemic model. Indian J Soc Psychiatry. 1985;1:174–85.
61. Shah A. Violence and abuse in therapy with couples: Guidelines and concerns of a therapist-cum-trainer. Eastern J Psychiatry. 2002;6:13–8.
62. Krishna VA, Bhatti RS, Chandra PS, Juvva S. Unheard voices: Experiences of families living with HIV/AIDS in India*. Contemp Fam Ther. 2005;27:483–506.
63. Chacko R. Family participation in the treatment and rehabilitation of the mentally ill. Indian J Psychiatry. 1967;9:328–33.
64. Narayanan H, Embar P. Review of treatment in a family ward. Indian J Psychiatry. 1972;14:123–6.
65. Pai S, Kapur RL. Impact of treatment intervention on the relationship between dimensions of clinical psychopathology, social dysfunction and burden on the family of psychiatric patients. Psychol Med. 1982;12:651–8.[PubMed]
66. Pai S, Kapur RL. Evaluation of home care treatment for schizophrenic patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:80–8.[PubMed]
67. Pai S, Roberts EJ. Follow-up study of schizophrenic patients initially treated with home care. Br J Psychiatry. 1983;143:447–50.[PubMed]
68. Pai S, Channabasavanna SM, Nagarajaiah, Raghuram R. Home care for chronic mental illness in Bangalore: An experiment in the prevention of repeated hospitalization. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;147:175–9.[PubMed]
69. Verghese A. Family participation in mental health care: The vellore experiment. Indian J Psychiatry. 1988;30:117–21.[PMC free article][PubMed]
70. Narayanan HS, Girimaji SR, Gandhi DH, Raju KM, Rao PM, Nardev G. Brief in-patient family intervention in mental retardation. Indian J Psychiatry. 1988;30:275–81.[PMC free article][PubMed]
71. Mehta M. A comparative study of family-based and patient-based behavioral management in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;157:133–5.[PubMed]
72. Shankar R, Menon M. Development of a framework of interventions with families in the management of schizophrenia. Psychosoc Rehabil. 1993;16:75–91.
73. Sovani A. Understanding schizophrenia: A family psychoeducational approach. Indian J Psychiatry. 1993;35:97–8.[PMC free article][PubMed]
74. Russell PS, al John JK, Lakshmanan JL. Family intervention for intellectually disabled children. Randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:254–8.[PubMed]
75. Shihabuddeen TM, Gopinath PS. Group meetings of caretakers of patients with schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorders. Indian J Psychiatry. 2005;47:153–6.[PMC free article][PubMed]
76. Thara R, Padmavati R, Lakshmi A, Karpagavalli P. Family education in schizophrenia: A comparison of two approaches. Indian J Psychiatry. 2005;47:218–21.[PMC free article][PubMed]
77. Das S, Saravanan B, Karunakaran KP, Manoranjitham S, Ezhilarasu P, Jacob KS. Effect of a structured educational intervention on explanatory models of relatives of patients with schizophrenia: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:286–7.[PubMed]
78. Suresh Kumar PN, Thomas B. Family intervention therapy in alcohol dependence syndrome: One-year follow-up study. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49:200–4.[PMC free article][PubMed]
79. Kulhara P, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A, Sharma A, Sharma S. Psychoeducational intervention for caregivers of Indian patients with schizophrenia: A randomized-controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119:472–83.[PubMed]
80. Chow W, Law S, Andermann L, Yang J, Leszcz M, Wong J, et al. Multi-family psycho-education group for assertive community treatment clients and families of culturally diverse background: A pilot study. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46:364–71.[PMC free article][PubMed]
81. Nattala P, Leung KS, Nagarajaiah, Murthy P. Family member involvement in relapse prevention improves alcohol dependence outcomes: A prospective study at an addiction treatment facility in India. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:581–7.[PubMed]
82. Devaramane V, Pai NB, Vella SL. The effect of a brief family intervention on primary carer's functioning and their schizophrenic relatives levels of psychopathology in India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2011;4:183–7.[PubMed]
83. Jones D, Bagga R, Nehra R, Deepika, Sethi S, Walia K, et al. Reducing Sexual Risk Behavior Among High-Risk Couples in Northern India. [Last Accessed on 2012 Dec 1];Int J Behav Med. Pub Online on May 12, 2012, Available at: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs12529-012-9235-4 . [PMC free article][PubMed]
84. Nath R, Craig J. Practising family therapy in India: How many people are there in a marital subsystem? J Fam Ther. 1999;21:390–406.
85. Shah A, Varghese M, Udaya Kumar GS, Bhatti RS, Raguram A, Sobhana H, et al. Brief family therapy training in India. J Fam Psychotherapy. 2000;11:41–53.
86. Carson DK, Chowdhury A. family therapy in India: A new profession in an ancient land? Contemp Fam Ther. 2000;22:387–406.
87. Natrajan R, Thomas V. Need for family therapy services for middle-class families in India. Contemp Fam Ther. 2002;24:483–503.
88. Rastogi M, Natrajan R, Thomas V. On becoming a profession: The growth of marriage and family therapy in India*. Contemp Fam Ther. 2005;27:453–71.
89. Mittal M, Hardy KV. A re-examination of the current status and future of family therapy in India. Contemp Fam Ther. 2005;27:285–300.
90. Carson DK, Jain S, Ramirez S. Counseling and family therapy in India: Evolving professions in a rapidly developing nation. Int J Adv Counselling. 2009;31:45–56.
91. Thomas B. Treating troubled families: Therapeutic scenario in India. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012;24:91–8.[PubMed]
92. Kumar P, Rohtagi K. Development of the marriage adjustment questionnaire. Indian J Psychol. 1976;51:346–58.
93. Prabhu R. Global Perspectives in Family Therapy: Development, Practice, Trends. In: Ng Kit S., editor. Beginning of family therapy in India. New York: Brunner-routledge; 2003. pp. 57–67.
94. Bochner S. Cross-Cultural Differences in the self concept a test of Hofstede's individualism/collectivism distinction. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1994;25:273–83.
95. Haj-Yahia MM, Sadan E. Issues in intervention with battered women in collectivist societies. J Marital Fam Ther. 2008;34:1–13.[PubMed]