Research Papers On African American Tutoring In Math

These are staggering results — I know of no initiative for disadvantaged young men of color that comes close. Bring students like these up to grade level and you’ve gone a long way toward closing the racial and ethnic gap in life success. Yet repeated failures have prompted some researchers to throw in the towel.

For “underperforming students,” high schools should “eschew traditional success metrics like test scores,” the economists Julie Berry Cullen, Steven D. Levitt, Erin Robertson and Sally Sadoff argued in a 2013 paper. Instead, they should stress “more pragmatic objectives like keeping kids out of trouble, giving them practical life skills and helping with labor market integration.” In other words: abandon the hope that these students can make it academically and double down on vocational education.

“In an ideal world,” they wrote, “high schools would perform miracles, bringing struggling students back from the brink and launching them towards four-year college degrees” — but efforts to achieve this on a large scale would probably be “extremely costly and largely ineffective.”

A colleague of Mr. Levitt’s, the Nobel laureate James J. Heckman, presents a similar argument on the science of early brain development: “Skill begets skill, and early skill makes later skill acquisition easier. Remedial programs in the adolescent and young adult years are much more costly in producing the same level of skill attainment in adulthood. Most are economically inefficient.”

But these economists are selling teenagers short. As the psychologist Laurence Steinberg points out in his path-breaking new book “Age of Opportunity: Lessons From the New Science of ,” during the past decade neuroscientists have realized that adolescence, like early childhood, is a “period of tremendous ‘neuroplasticity,’ ” during which the brain has solid potential to change through experience. During the past generation, educators have focused on the growth between birth and age 3, but the teen years may be just as important for shaping a person’s future.

As any teacher will tell you, there’s no good way to manage a ninth-grade math class in which some students are working on quadratic equations while others are still mastering multiplication and division. There’s a “mismatch between what many students need and what schools can provide,” Jonathan Guryan, an economics professor at and faculty co-director of the ’s Urban Education Lab, points out.

The tutoring program tackles this problem with intensive support, providing a safety net for students who have fallen far behind. Working two-on-one, the tutors, most of them recent college graduates, can individualize instruction to suit each student’s needs. They are trained not only in how to teach math but also in how to relate to these teenagers.

“It’s friendship and pushing — they nag them to success,” Barbara Algarin, the executive director of Match Education, which runs the tutoring program, told me. “These students can make remarkable progress when they appreciate that their tutor is in their corner. The math connection leads to better study skills and a love of learning. Grades improve across the board.”

American parents spend $7 billion annually on tutoring, in some cases as much as $400 an hour, to reassure themselves that they are giving their children every advantage in the academic rat race, and research on the impact of tutoring backs them up. But the high cost of traditional tutoring has made it hard to offer this kind of help to the students who need it most. Because the Match tutors earn about $16,000 a year plus benefits, about what other public service programs like City Year pay, the Chicago program is a relative bargain, costing about $3,800 a year for each student. (To put that figure in context, spends more than $20,000 per pupil, and even more in schools serving poor neighborhoods.)

“Just a few years of this type of intervention could bring almost all students up to grade level,” Jens Ludwig, a professor of social service administration at the University of Chicago and the director of its Crime Lab, told me. “By then they can benefit from what’s being taught in regular classes and have real hope for a high school diploma.”

To Mayor , who plans to expand the program, the lesson is plain. “What this shows is, don’t ever throw the towel in on the kids,” the mayor said last March. What’s happening in Chicago shows that, without breaking the bank, the lives of adolescents can be turned around.

Continue reading the main story
  • Akah, R. M. (1990). What black students need from tutoring. J. Coll. Student Dev. 31: 177.Google Scholar

  • Allen, V. L. (ed.). (1976). Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

  • Allen, V. L., and Feldman, R. S. (1973). Learning through tutoring: Low achieving children as tutors. J. Exp. Educ. 42: 1–5.Google Scholar

  • Allen, V. L., and Feldman, R. S. (1976). Studies on the role of tutor. In Allen, V. L. (ed.), Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar

  • Allsopp, D. H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remed. Spec. Educ. 18: 367–380.Google Scholar

  • Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., and Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 12: 385–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Balenzano, S., Agte, L. J., McLaughlin, T. F., and Howard, V. F. (1993). Training tutoring skills with preschool children with disabilities in a classroom setting. Child Fam. Behav. Ther. 51: 1–36.Google Scholar

  • Bar-Eli, N., and Raviv, A. (1982). Underachievers as tutors. J. Educ. Res. 75: 139–143.Google Scholar

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Berliner, D. C., and Cassanova, U. (January 1990). The case for peer tutoring. Instructor 16–17.Google Scholar

  • Bierman, K. L., and Furman, W. (1981). Effects of role and assignment rationale on attitudes formed during peer tutoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 73: 33–40.Google Scholar

  • Blasovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., and Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychol. Sci. 12: 225–229.Google Scholar

  • Britz, M. W., Dixon, J., and McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The effects of peer tutoring on mathematics performance: A recent review. B. C. J. Spec. Educ. 13: 17–33.Google Scholar

  • Brush, T. A. (1997). The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 45: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Chapman, E. S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer-assisted learning programs. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, E. G. (1980). Design and redesign of the desegregated school: Problems of status, power, and conflict. In Stephan, W. G., and Feagin, J. R. (eds.), School Desegregation: Past, Present, and Future, Plenum, New York, pp. 251–280.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1986). Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychol. Schools 23: 175–186.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19: 237–248.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, H. M., and Lindsay, J. J. (1998). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. In Bickman, L., and Rog, D. J. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 315–337.Google Scholar

  • Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., and Hall, J. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Except. Children 52: 535–542.Google Scholar

  • DePaulo, B. M., Tang, J., Webb, W., Hoover, C., Marsh, K., and Litowitz, C. (1989). Age differences in reactions to help in a peer tutoring context. Child Dev. 60: 423–439.Google Scholar

  • Devin-Sheehan, L., Feldman, R. S., and Allen, V. L. (1976). Research on children tutoring children: A critical review. Rev. Educ. Res. 46: 355–385.Google Scholar

  • Dill, E. M., and Boykin, A. W. (2000). The comparative influence of individual, peer tutoring, and communal learning contexts on the text recall of African American children. J. Black Psychol. 26: 65–78.Google Scholar

  • Early, J. W. (1998). The Impact of Peer Tutoring on Self-Esteem and Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Mathematics Performance of Tenth Grade Students. Unpublished Dissertation, Texas A&M University, Commerce.Google Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., and Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T., and Trautner, H. M. (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 123–174.Google Scholar

  • Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., and Harold, R. E. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. J. Soc. Issues 46: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Education Trust (2003). African American Achievement in America. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www2.edtrust.org/EdTrust/achievement$+$in$+$america.htm

  • Ehly, S. W., and Bratton, B. (1981). Experimental analysis of some process variables in peer tutorial learning. Psychol. Rec. 31: 537–541.Google Scholar

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Davis, G. Y., and Ginsburg, M. D. (1995). Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student self-concept and mathematics achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 87: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., and Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., and Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. J. School Psychol. 28: 309–323.Google Scholar

  • Fennema, E. H., and Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and socio-cultural factors. Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 51–71.Google Scholar

  • Fogarty, J. L., and Wang, M. C. (1982). An investigation of the cross-age peer tutoring process: Some implications for instructional design and motivation. Element. School J. 82: 451–469.Google Scholar

  • Foot, H., and Howe, C. (1998). The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B., and Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. Am. Educ. Res. J. 31: 75–103.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., and Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Element. School J. 97: 223–249.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., and Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Element. School J. 101: 495–510.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N., Hamlett, C. L., and Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies on students with various learning histories. School Psychol. Rev. 24: 604–620.Google Scholar

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., and Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychol. Rev. 31: 569–583.Google Scholar

  • Ginsburg-Block, M. D., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of “teacher” and “student” interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychol. Q. 12: 134–149.Google Scholar

  • Ginsburg-Block, M. D., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 560–569.Google Scholar

  • Good, C., and Aronson, J. (2002). The development and consequences of stereotype vulnerability in adolescents. In Pajeres, F., and Urdan, T. (eds.), Adolescence and Education, Vol. 2: Academic Motivation of Adolescents, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar

  • Good, J. M., Halpin, G., and Halpin, G. (2000). A promising prospect for minority retention: Students becoming peer mentors. J. Negro Educ. 69: 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Except. Children 57(6): 521–535.Google Scholar

  • Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., and Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychol. Rev. 17(2): 258–275.Google Scholar

  • Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., and Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Terry, B., Wade, L., Stanley, S. O., Thibadeau, S., and Delquadri, J. C. (1984). Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: An ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 17: 521–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwood, C. R., and Terry, B. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychol. Rev. 22: 497–517.Google Scholar

  • Greer, R. D., and Polirstok, S. R. (1982). Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by inner-city adolescents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 15: 123–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hedges, L. V., and Nowell, A. (1998). Black-white test score convergence since 1965. In Jencks, C., and Phillips, M. (eds.), The Black-White Test Score Gap, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC., pp. 149–181.Google Scholar

  • Heller, L. R., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1993). Reciprocal peer tutoring and parent partnership: Does parent involvement make a difference? School Psychol. Rev. 22: 517–534.Google Scholar

  • Hilger, L. H. (2000). Cross-age Tutoring in Reading: Academic and Attitudinal Effects From High-School Tutors and Third-Grade Tutees. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

  • House, J. D., and Wohlt, V. (1991). Effect of tutoring on voluntary school withdrawal of academically underprepared minority students. J. School Psychol. 29: 135–142.Google Scholar

  • Hunter, J. E., and Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar

  • Jacobs, J. E., and Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educ. Res. 14(3): 20–25.Google Scholar

  • Jencks, C., and Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White Test Score Gap, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Jones, M. G., and Carter, G. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behavior of ability-grouped dyads. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 31(6): 603–619.Google Scholar

  • King, A., Staffieri, A., and Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kosters, M. H., and Mast, B. D. (2003). Closing the Education Achievement Gap: Is Title I Working? The AEI Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • Madrid, D., Terry, B., Greenwood, C., Whaley, M., and Webber, N. (1998). Active vs. passive peer tutoring: Teaching spelling to at risk students. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 31: 236–244.Google Scholar

  • Maher, C. A., Maher, B. C., and Thurston, C. J. (1998). Disruptive students as tutors: A systems approach to planning and evaluation of programs. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 145–163.Google Scholar

  • Marx, D. M., and Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1183–1193.Google Scholar

  • Medway, F. J., and Baron, R. M. (1977). Locus of control and tutor's instructional style as determinants of cross-age tutoring effectiveness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2: 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Menikoff, L. B. (1999). The Effects of Cross-Age Tutoring Upon the Decoding Skills, Attitudes Toward Reading, Teacher Perceptions of Reading Improvement, and the Self-Concept of Inner-City at-Risk Students. Unpublished Dissertation, The City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics: Student performance in mathematics. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/hispanics/Section6.asp.

  • Nazzal, A. (2002). Peer tutoring and at-risk students: An exploratory study. Act. Teach. Train. 24: 68–80.Google Scholar

  • OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from http://ninetta.sourceoecd.org/vl=709007.

  • Paolitto, D. P. (1976). The effect of cross-age tutoring on adolescence: An inquiry into theoretical assumptions. Rev. Educ. Res. 46: 215–237.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, N. B., Fuchs, L. S., and Fuchs, D. (1994). Effects of classwide curriculum-based measurement and peer tutoring: A collaborative researcher-practitioner interview study. J. Learn. Disabil. 27(7): 420–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Polirstok, S. R., and Greer, R. D. (1986). A replication of collateral effects and a component analysis of a successful tutoring package for inner-city adolescents. Educ. Treat. Children 9: 101–121.Google Scholar

  • Ponzio, R. C., and Peterson, K. D. (1999). Adolescents as effective instructors of child science: Participant perceptions. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 33: 36–46.Google Scholar

  • Reckrut, M. D. (1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. J. Read. 37: 356–362.Google Scholar

  • Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., and Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Psychol. 95: 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosen, S., Powell, E. R., and Schubot, D. B. (1978). Peer tutoring outcomes as influenced by the equity and type of role assignment. J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 244–252.Google Scholar

  • Roswal, G. M., Mims, A. A., Evans, M. D., Smith, B., Young, M., Burch, M., Croce, R., Horvat, M. A., and Block, M. (1995). Effects of collaborative peer tutoring on urban seventh graders. J. Educ. Res. 88: 275–279.Google Scholar

  • Ryan, K. E., and Ryan, A. M. (2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance. Educ. Psychol. 40(1): 53–63.Google Scholar

  • Schofield, J. W. (1980). Cooperation as social exchange: Resource gaps and reciprocity in academic work. In Sharan, S., Hare, P., Webb, C. D., and Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (eds.), Cooperation in Education, Brigham Young University Press, Provo, UT, pp. 160–181.Google Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. (1998). Peer modeling. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar

  • Sharpley, A. M., Irvine, J. W., and Sharpley, C. F. (1983). An examination of the effectiveness of cross-age tutoring program in mathematics for elementary school children. Am. Educ. Res. J. 20: 103–111.Google Scholar

  • Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Hodge, J. P., and Mathes, P. G. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 9: 203–212.Google Scholar

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations. In Banks, J. A., and McGee Banks, C. A (eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, Macmillan, New York, pp. 628–646.Google Scholar

  • Smead, V. S. (1984). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Dead end or promising beginning? Alberta J. Educ. Res. 30: 145–156.Google Scholar

  • Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluat. Educ. 4: 22–24.Google Scholar

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Sprinthall, N. A., and Scott, J. R. (1989). Promoting psychological development, math achievement, and success attribution of female students through deliberate psychological education. J. Counsel. Psychol. 36: 440–446.Google Scholar

  • Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 797–811.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Steele, C. M., Spencer, S., and Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 379–440.Google Scholar

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., Ronchi, D., and Hansell, S. (1976). Tutoring and psychological growth. In Allen, V. L. (ed.), Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar

  • Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66: 21–36.Google Scholar

  • Tabacek, D. A., McLaughlin, T. F., and Howard, V. F. (1994). Teaching preschool children with disabilities tutoring skills: Effects on preacademic behaviors. Child Fam. Behav. Ther. 16(2): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Thomas, E. J., and Biddle, B. J. (1966). The nature and history of role theory. In Biddle, B. J., and Thomas, E. J. (eds.), Role Theory: Concepts and Research, Wiley, New York, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

  • Topping, K. J. (2000). Peer Assisted Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers, Brookling Books, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Topping, K. J. (1998). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. In Goodlad, S. (ed.), Mentoring and Tutoring by Students, Kogan Page, London, pp. 49–69.Google Scholar

  • Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (1998). Introduction to peer-assisted learning. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

  • Topping, K. J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., and Whale, M. (2004). Cross-age tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educ. Psychol. 24: 57–75.Google Scholar

  • Topping, K. J., and Whiteley, M. (1993). Sex differences in the effectiveness of peer tutoring. School Psychol. Int. 14: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, R. H. (2002). Role theory. In Turner, J. H. (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory, Kluwer, New York, pp. 233–254.Google Scholar

  • Underwood, J., Underwood, G., and Wood, D. (2000). When does gender matter? Interactions during computer-based problem solving. Learn. Instruct. 10: 447–462.Google Scholar

  • Wagner, L. (1990). Social and historical perspectives on peer teaching in education. In Foot, H. C., Morgan, M. J., and Schute, R. H. (eds.), Children Helping Children, Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar

  • White, P. M. (2000). Promoting Mathematics Achievement, Academic Efficacy, and Cognitive Development of at-risk Adolescents Through Deliberate Psychological Education. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Houston.Google Scholar

  • Wood, W., and Christensen, P. (2004). Quantitative research synthesis: Examining study outcomes over samples, settings, and time. In Sansone, C., Morf, C., and Panter, A. T. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 335–356.Google Scholar

  • Yueh, J., and Alessi, S. M. (1988). The effect of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct. 15: 18–22.Google Scholar

  • Categories: 1

    0 Replies to “Research Papers On African American Tutoring In Math”

    Leave a comment

    L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *